Continued inquiries to both Guardian Asset Management and Housing and Urban Development have purposefully gone unanswered with respect to the latest in what has become Bridgegate with respect to the Awards in the HUD M&M FSM Contract. In BREAKING NEWS, it was discovered that in the latest of a two year string of Bridge Contracts, Adobe, the digital certification authority, rendered two of the three signatories invalid — Nicole Jackson, Competition Advocate Alternative; and Jimmy Fleming-Scott, Head of the Contracting Activity. Now, both of these signatures must be valid as they are a series of checks and balances from $750K – $15 Million and $15 Million to $75 Million. The US government did that because letting that much money roam around without accountability, well, you end up with shit like Iraq and Ukraine.
What if, though, all of the Bridge Contracts were invalidated? What if they were all forged? And, just thinking out loud here, what if JGM Property Group and 24 Asset Management all had the legal right to have been performing months ago? Yup, you got it, Bridgegate. No matter which way you spin it, Bridgegate. And where the questions really start to mount up is who had the most to lose? Well, from a no bid, zero competition point-of-view, that would have been Guardian Asset Management. And we did forward them over our results; however, Dan Leader has been far too busy to answer — or so we are told.
The shitstorm on the horizon will be of #Epic proportions as Congress prepares to line up the administrative staff involved both at Guardian as well as HUD in an attempt to figure out what went down. Stay tuned as we continue our coverage of this fast breaking story, its implications, and the missing staff surrounding Bridgegate!
