Blog

$130,000 More: A Minnesota Vendor Says 24 Asset Management Owes For Lead Based Paint Work HUD Already Paid For

By
Editor In Chief
-
Turner On Labor

A vendor in Minnesota has come forward with the latest claim, and it is the heaviest yet. The vendor was forwarded Foreclosurepedia’s reporting on the HUD FSM 3.12 awards and says 24 Asset Management owes $130,000 for completed, approved work.

That claim goes onto a running tally of unpaid Labor that now exceeds half a million dollars. Every article in this series adds to the same number, and not one has drawn a reply from HUD or from the Office of Inspector General.

What The Vendor Says Is Owed

The vendor reports close to 1,100 completed and approved Lead Based Paint work orders, dating from June 24 through October 1, with some projects reaching back to July. That is more than three months of production, performed in the field, approved, and submitted.

The vendor also reports 30 completed excessive debris projects that remain unpaid, the oldest dating to 2024. A bill that has sat for two years is not a cash flow problem. It is a decision about who gets paid and who waits.

Almost all of these work orders, the vendor says, were paid by HUD. The vendor says a HUD Contracting Officer verified that payment to 24 Asset Management on the approved work. Foreclosurepedia has not seen that conversation and reports it as the vendor’s account.

I received your name and company as someone to contact regarding unpaid debt from 24 Assets. I was forwarded your article regarding the HUD FSM contract and the total mess 24 has created. Currently, 24 Assets owe me $130,000. I have LBP projects dating back to July, which HUD has paid 24. Close to 1,100 completed and approved individual work orders dating from June 24th to October 1. Excessive debris work orders are a mess; they owe me for 30 completed projects dating back to 2024. Almost all of these work orders have been paid by HUD. I have spoken to a HUD Contracting Officer and verified payment to 24 on approved work orders.

24 Asset Management Got Paid And Kept The Money

Take the vendor’s account at its plain meaning. HUD paid 24 Asset Management for work that Labor performed, and 24 Asset Management did not pass that money down. That is not a payment delay, and it is not a dispute between trading partners.

Foreclosurepedia’s position is that a prime contractor that collects federal money for approved work and refuses to pay the subcontractors who performed it violates the False Claims Act. A prime that asks HUD for payment represents that it is entitled to the money. Collecting on that representation and keeping what belongs to Labor is the conduct the statute was written to punish.

Lead Is Not Trash

The vendor made one point forcefully, and it deserves space. Lead Based Paint work is not hauling debris out of a vacant house. It demands training, containment, and careful cleanup, and it carries real health risk for the crew and for the next family that lives in the home. A vendor who does that work correctly, wins approval, and then waits months for payment has financed a federal contract out of pocket while carrying the liability.

HUD Wrote It Down

HUD has already told the public why the 3.12 contracts failed. In its Justification and Approval for Other Than Full and Open Competition, J&A 26-30, HUD says it will not exercise the next option for the affected areas. It cites lack of performance, and it lists what that lack of performance caused.

HUD’s words: “key vendors suspending operations because of outstanding client invoices, lack of property preservation and maintenance triggering property liens and blocking the marketing or sale of homes, and non-payments escalated to Congressional inquiries, putting the Agency’s reputation and funding at risk.”

Read that slowly. HUD is not describing a paperwork dispute. It is describing vendors who shut their doors because they were not paid, homes frozen by liens, and Congress asking questions. The agency wrote it, and the agency signed it. HUD cannot say it did not know.

HUD Congressional Inquiries

The Contractor Behind The Nonpayment Held Six Of Those Contracts

24 Asset Management held six of the 3.12 vehicles: 3A/4A, 5A/8A, 1D, 4D/5D, 5P, and 3S/5S. Spectrum Solutions Acquisitions held 2D and 4S/6S. Those incumbents continue through option year 2, with ordering periods running to February 15, 2027.

HUD’s stated reason for walking away is nonpayment. The vendors’ stated experience is that the prime was paid and Labor was not. Foreclosurepedia has now documented well over half a million dollars in claims, and HUD has taken no public step to recover a dollar of it for the people who did the work.

HUD’s Answer Was A Limited-Sources Award And A Chapter 11 Debtor

HUD’s replacement vehicle is J&A 26-30, a limited-sources procurement worth an estimated $170,829,743.00 across eight areas. HUD invoked “unusual and compelling urgency” to skip full and open competition. The term is 30 months, a 12-month base, one 12-month option, and a six-month extension.

HUD sent a Sources Sought Notice to five companies in July 2026, and all five answered. HUD shortlisted three as “uniquely capable”: Alpine Companies, P.K. Management Group, and A2Z Field Services. Altisource Solutions and VRM Mortgage Services answered in writing too and were not shortlisted.

A2Z Field Services is a Chapter 11 debtor in Subchapter V, Case No. 2:26-bk-52098 in the Southern District of Ohio. Its own sworn monthly operating report for August shows $1,979.31 in the bank, zero full-time employees, and $261,065.19 in post-petition vendor bills past due.

Either HUD never opened a public court record that anyone can pull in ten minutes, or HUD read it and shortlisted a bankrupt company that is not paying vendors for a program it says was ruined by vendors who did not pay. Both answers are an indictment.

Foreclosurepedia put A2Z’s sworn bankruptcy declaration in front of HUD’s Craig Karnes in May 2026, more than a month before the Sources Sought Notice went out. He did not reply.

The Rush To Award

HUD’s own paper trail adds to the problem. Alpine’s three awards, 3A/4A, 5A/8A, and 4S/6S, totaling $51,568,665.00, were signed before the Chief Procurement Officer approved the J&A. Then HUD issued Amendment 0001, partially canceling four areas with no stated reason. Those four areas, 1D, 2D, 4D/5D, and 5P, carry $96,622,154.00, or 56.56 percent of the J&A.

The approval chain is on the page. Paul M. Olin certified for the program office. Contracting Officer Charles W. Hoyle Jr. signed. Francine L. Hemphill, as Chief Procurement Officer, approved. Each had the authority to stop it and ask what HUD had checked. Foreclosurepedia has seen nothing showing that anyone did.

What This Is, and What It Isn’t

Federal rules require a prime contractor to certify that its subcontractors are entitled to payment before it requests payment from the government. That is FAR 52.232-27(h). A prime that certifies, collects, and then does not pay has a serious problem under that clause and under the False Claims Act.

The separate FAR 52.242-5 requirement to notify the contracting officer of late or reduced subcontractor payments does not apply to small business primes, and 24 Asset Management is one. That gap may explain why HUD heard so little from the prime while the debt grew.

A False Claims Act case still requires proof of what 24 Asset Management knew and certified. Foreclosurepedia has not seen the work orders, the HUD payment records, or the Contracting Officer conversation. That is exactly why the vendors’ records belong in front of investigators now, and the statute lets Labor put them there.

What Labor Must Do Now

File the complaint. Every unpaid Field Service Technician and Inspector, and every contractor stacked beneath them, who has a record of work HUD paid for should report it in three places.

Go to america.gov/fraud and file your claim. It is separate and outside of HUD.

Go to the HUD Office of Inspector General hotline and file here: https://www.hudoig.gov/hotline/hotline-form#no-back

Report it to Foreclosurepedia at [email protected].

Keep every work order, approval, photograph, invoice, and message about payment. If a HUD official verified payment to the prime on your work, write down who said it, when, and what was said.

Stay Off The HUD M&M FSM Contract

Unless and until the money owed to Labor is paid, Foreclosurepedia is calling on Labor to avoid the HUD M&M FSM contract. HUD’s own document says nonpayment is wrecking the program. The vendors say HUD paid the prime and Labor still went unpaid. Working that contract on those terms means financing a federal program out of your own pocket, and Foreclosurepedia considers it unsafe.

Do not take the work. Do not extend credit to a prime that has not paid its last invoice. Do not let anyone tell you the money is coming.

HUD said vendors were not paid. The vendors say HUD paid. The total is above half a million dollars, the Inspector General has not answered, and Labor is the only party in this chain that has already done its job.

The Debt Owed Thus Far

 

State/Territory Low High Basis
Puerto Rico $42,900.00 $42,900.00 Documented: audits of 2,145 properties
Illinois $29,286.50 $29,286.50 Documented: invoice sheet, 250 work orders
Texas, New Mexico, Puerto Rico $45,458.00 $45,458.00 Documented: formal claim, 1,023 invoices
Central Florida $37,035.00 $37,035.00 Documented: vendor invoice list
Pennsylvania $100,000.00 $100,000.00 Vendor-reported, two vendors, approximate
Iowa $25,000.00 $30,000.00 Vendor-reported
Indiana $28,000.00 $28,000.00 Vendor-reported, three cleanouts
Minnesota $158,000.00 $158,000.00 Vendor-reported, two vendors: $130,000.00 (about 1,100 Lead Based Paint work orders and 30 debris projects) and $28,000.00
Colorado $20,800.00 $20,800.00 Vendor-reported
Montana $3,500.00 $3,500.00 Vendor-reported
Nebraska $30,000.00 $30,000.00 Vendor-reported
North Dakota $24,000.00 $24,000.00 Vendor-reported
State not identified $46,000.00 $46,000.00 Vendor-reported: $33,000.00 on one asset since April, $13,000.00 since March
Total $589,979.50 $594,979.50

 

 

HUD Put It In Writing: Unpaid Vendors Put The Agency’s “Funding At Risk.” The White House Is Now Paying For Fraud Tips. Labor Should File.

By
Editor In Chief
-
HUDSEC Turner Throne

On Tuesday the President and the Vice President opened a $25 million Fraud Whistleblower Incentive Program. Go to https://america.gov/fraud and file your complaint today. The Justice Department runs it. Make sure you have the names of the companies, which in most cases is 24 Asset Management, the vendor managers, staff, everyone you contacted or spoke with via phone or email, your amounts owed and work order numbers, and FILE TODAY! Stealing money on federal contracts such as the HUD M&M FSM is not right. Nor is HUD proposing never to pay Labor and simply short list a company like A2Z Field Services which is in Chapter 11 bankruptcy as the solution.

The President described it as a 1 percent commission with “no limit,” and said journalists can take part. He also said he will personally decide who gets paid when more than one person claims the same tip.

Foreclosurepedia is not deciding what is fraud. That call belongs to the White House, and the door is now open. What Foreclosurepedia can do is put HUD’s own words in front of Labor before anyone files. The President was quite clear that “…the money will be paid out “if we recover the money” rather than if criminal charges are brought.” We already know that monies have been collected by HUD against 24 Asset Management, so this seems to be a slam dunk. Reread that and FILE TODAY!

What HUD Wrote

HUD’s Justification and Approval 26-30 explains why the agency will not exercise the next option on its current Field Service Management contracts. HUD cites “key vendors suspending operations because of outstanding client invoices, lack of property preservation and maintenance triggering property liens and blocking the marketing or sale of homes, and non-payments escalated to Congressional inquiries, putting the Agency’s reputation and funding at risk.”

Read that again. A federal agency signed a document saying that non-payment to vendors on its own contracts put its funding at risk. It did not write that as a theory. It wrote it as the reason.

The justification does not name a contractor. It does not name a dollar amount. The tie to 24 Asset Management comes from Foreclosurepedia’s reporting on the six vehicles HUD awarded that company and the Field Service Technicians and Inspectors left unpaid on them, which by Foreclosurepedia’s tally stands at no less than $353,679.50.

Four Signatures

Paul M. Olin certified the justification as accurate and complete. Contracting Officer Charles W. Hoyle Jr. certified it. Acting Deputy Chief Procurement Officer Amber Jones signed it. Chief Procurement Officer Francine L. Hemphill approved it.

Four officials put their names under a document that admits the problem. Secretary Scott Turner runs the department that produced it. Nobody on that signature page wrote down what happens to the vendors who were not paid.

Craig Karnes, a senior HUD official along with Sharon Washington and LaShura Ford, both working at HUD, have been in the loop for months. I would cite that in the filing so that the information might be more readily found in the searches conducted.

Uniquely Capable

The same document names Alpine Companies, P.K. Management Group and A2Z Field Services as “uniquely capable” of running the replacement work. It prices eight areas at $170,829,743.00. Alpine holds awards for three, and the other five carry $117,886,987.00 with no awardee Foreclosurepedia has seen.

A2Z is a Chapter 11 debtor in the Southern District of Ohio. HUD wrote that non-payment endangers its funding, then put a debtor on the list to take over the work.

The Old Work Keeps Running

HUD also wrote that the incumbents “will continue performance for option 2 in the eight contract areas through February 15, 2027, and option 3 will not be exercised.”

So Field Service Technicians and Inspectors keep working on contracts that HUD itself has written up as a reputation and funding risk. Foreclosurepedia has sent reports listing 24 Asset Management’s victims to Craig Karnes, acting deputy director of all HUD procurement, for years. HUD will not discuss the debt.

What Labor Does Now

File at https://america.gov/fraud and describe what happened in plain words, name the HUD-funded work, and let the White House decide what it is.

Document every unpaid work order by property, service, date and amount. Keep your invoices, completion photos, texts and emails. Keep your 1099 and compare it to your bank deposits.

Quote HUD’s own sentence in your filing. The agency has already said what non-payment does to its contracts.

File with the HUD Office of Inspector General as well. Then call your Representative and your Senator. Reach out directly to your local media providers such as newspaper and tv. HUD wrote that Congressional inquiries over non-payment hurt its reputation.

HUD wrote it down. The vendors are still waiting. The program is open.

HUD Wrote Its Own Indictment: Eight Years Of Broken Procurements, At Least $353,679.50 Owed To Labor, A Bankrupt Firm On The Shortlist, And Congress Already Asking Questions

By
Editor In Chief
-
HUD On FIre

Every day brings another headline, another controversy, and another crisis under the failed leadership of Secretary Scott Turner on the HUD M&M FSM as his henchman Paul Olin, Acting Deputy Secretary, scrambles to bury his head in the sand. Impeachment may be in the wind for Secretary Turner and only the midterms will tell.

HUD’s own Justification and Approval admits that unpaid vendors, liened houses and Congressional inquiries ended its Field Service Management contracts. It never admits that HUD ran the program that produced all three.

One Paragraph. Every Failure HUD Hoped You Would Not Add Up.

Buried in Section 2 of a class Justification and Approval covering eight Field Service Management areas, HUD wrote a sentence that deserves to be read aloud in a hearing room. HUD says it will not exercise the next option on the 3.12 contracts “due to the lack of performance resulting in: key vendors suspending operations because of outstanding client invoices, lack of property preservation and maintenance triggering property liens and blocking the marketing or sale of homes, and non-payments escalated to Congressional inquiries, putting the Agency’s reputation and funding at risk.”

That is HUD describing HUD’s program. HUD picked the awardees. HUD wrote the contracts. HUD approved the invoices. HUD collected the complaints. HUD now announces that the result is a threat to its own funding, and it files the confession as a procurement formality.

The sentence does not name a contractor. It does not name a dollar amount. It does not say who failed to pay, who failed to preserve, or who failed to oversee. It assigns the blame to “lack of performance” and moves on to the shortlist, as if the agency that ran the contracts for years had been a bystander.

HUD Congressional Inquiries

The Ledger HUD Left Out

Foreclosurepedia has monitored HUD’s Management and Marketing Field Service Management program for decades. The public record, including a federal decision HUD itself appeared in, tells the story of an agency that cannot plan, cannot award cleanly, and cannot supervise what it awards.

HUD planned to issue the 3.12 solicitation in October 2018. According to the Government Accountability Office, it could not post it until February 2021. The delay followed an appeal by the Small Business Administration of HUD’s own competition decision and protests, sustained by GAO, over a sister solicitation that failed to reflect the pandemic. That is twenty-eight months lost before a single 3.12 contractor was chosen.

In May 2021, Alpine Companies protested HUD’s interim “bridge” competition, and HUD canceled it rather than defend it. HUD then offered sixty-day sole-source extensions at existing prices and hoped every contract holder would say yes.

They did not. Five days before the final 3.10 task orders expired, HUD learned that Innotion Enterprises would not extend two areas and that holders of three others would not extend either. GAO counts that as two business days. HUD had not posted the replacement solicitation until three months before the old orders ran out. It had no fallback and never asked what would happen if the incumbents walked.

On May 30, 2021, HUD extended DGG RE Investments’ existing task orders and added the five areas. No competition, no proposals and no evaluation covered them. GAO denied the protest, citing the pandemic and the legal standard that an agency’s planning need not be error-free. That sentence describes the law. It was never praise for HUD, and HUD should not wear it as a medal.

HUD did give a reason for DGG. It told GAO that DGG was already performing similar work at a satisfactory or higher level and already had a presence in three of the Homeownership Centers. Agree with it or not, that is a reason an agency can point to. HUD had watched DGG work inside the program.

The eleven-area 3.12 awards then went to three companies and drew protests from the firms that lost. On July 27, 2022, HUD told GAO it would cancel all eleven awards, reevaluate proposals and decide again. Days later it posted another urgency justification to keep services running. The pattern repeats. HUD loses the calendar, claims an emergency, and skips competition.

Now it is October 2026 and HUD is doing it a third time. The Federal Acquisition Regulation says contracting without full and open competition may not be justified by a lack of advance planning. Eight years is not an emergency. It is a management record.

At Least $353,679.50 Owed. The Number Is Climbing.

Foreclosurepedia’s running tally of unpaid Field Service Technicians and Inspectors on 24 Asset Management work stands at no less than $353,679.50. It is a floor, not an audit, and it approaches $400,000.

The paper behind it includes $42,900.00 in Puerto Rico audits, a $29,286.50 Illinois sheet, a $45,458.00 claim covering 1,023 invoices and a $37,035.00 Central Florida list. The rest comes from vendors who reported what they are owed. Foreclosurepedia is not naming them.

HUD did not discover this in a headline. Craig Karnes, a senior HUD official wrote in 2023, to Foreclosurepedia, that HUD “is aware of the relationship between 24 Asset Management and Assero.” Assero is the predecessor firm whose own vendors went unpaid. Aware. That is HUD’s word. Foreclosurepedia has seen no referral to HUD’s Office of Inspector General in the years since. HUD was aware, and the debt grew.

Labor Is Paying HUD’s Penalties

Foreclosurepedia has reported that HUD assesses liquidated damages against its prime contractors, a feature carried from the 3.10 contracts into 3.12. HUD takes its money first, for missed quality control and similar failures. Labor is last in line.

The prime contractor being docked has fewer dollars to pay the people who did the work. HUD keeps its penalty and writes a procurement document about vendors going unpaid. Nobody tells a Field Service Technician or Inspector whether the work order they completed will ever turn into money.

That is the snowball. Field Service Technicians and Inspectors cannot pay their own subcontractors. Trucks, insurance and fuel go on credit cards. Small firms miss payroll. Bankruptcies begin. Families lose homes while the homes HUD owns sit with overgrown grass and liens attached. HUD’s own Justification says so.

HUD’s Answer To Unpaid Vendors: A Debtor, A HUD OIG Audit And Two Insecure Websites

Having confessed that non-payment ended the old contracts, HUD turned to the replacements. The Justification names Alpine Companies, P.K. Management Group and A2Z Field Services as “uniquely capable” of running contracts worth an estimated $170,829,743.00. HUD says it reached that finding through capability matrices and past performance data.

Foreclosurepedia’s files name 24 Asset Management, Spectrum and JGM as the 3.12 incumbents. None of the three shortlisted firms is on that list. Altisource Solutions and Vendor Resource Management answered the same Sources Sought Notice in writing and were not shortlisted. HUD has not said why.

A2Z: The Debtor

A2Z Field Services is a Chapter 11 debtor in Case No. 2:26-bk-52098, in the Southern District of Ohio. Its sworn August report shows $1,979.31 in the bank, zero full-time employees and $261,065.19 in past-due vendor bills with approximately 600 vendors owed.

HUD’s Justification says the work requires “a fully staffed and equipped office.” A2Z told a federal bankruptcy court it has no full-time employees. The docket is public and anyone can pull it in minutes. HUD either never pulled it or pulled it and shortlisted the debtor anyway. Both answers are an indictment.

PKMG: The HUD OIG Audit And The Website

P.K. Management Group has a history with HUD’s own Office of Inspector General. A 2016 HUD OIG audit of its Illinois work found that PKMG did not always provide property preservation and protection services as its HUD contract required. The auditors also found that it billed HUD for properties it had not serviced.

The Inspector General recommended that PKMG repay more than $19,000 for 105 properties that were not adequately maintained and more than $2,300 for properties it never serviced. The auditors projected that HUD could pay more than $2.5 million over the following year in fees for work not done to contract standards.

Foreclosurepedia reported in 2018 that every award PKMG held at that time drew a protest, and that the awardee entity was under a Service Contract Act pay investigation. HUD’s Justification mentions none of this.

The public face of the firm HUD calls “uniquely capable” does not support a secure connection. Browsers with HTTPS protection turned on stop visitors with a full-page warning before the page loads. Click through, and the site still describes PKMG as prime on HUD’s old M&M 3.6 and 3.8 programs. It never mentions 3.12.

Alpine: The Template

Alpine Companies has already been awarded three areas worth $51,568,665.00. Its website runs on plain, unencrypted HTTP, consists of two pages built on a GoDaddy template, and carries a 2022 copyright.

A website proves nothing about performance, and Foreclosurepedia does not claim it does. It shows what “uniquely capable” did not require, which is anything the public can check. A firm holding a $51.5 million federal award has published no capability statement, no team and no past-performance reference where Labor can read it.

Two of the three firms HUD trusts with $170,829,743.00 run public sites that do not support a secure connection. The third is in bankruptcy court.

Nobody On The List Has Current Experience. The Firms That Were Cut Never Got The Same Pass.

Alpine has not performed HUD M&M Field Service Management work for some years. PKMG’s own website still lists the 3.6 and 3.8 programs, which are generations old. A2Z is in bankruptcy court with no full-time employees. None of the three can claim current experience running these contracts.

Then “current experience” cannot be what separated the three from the two. Altisource Solutions and Vendor Resource Management answered the same Sources Sought Notice in writing. HUD cut both and kept a debtor, a HUD OIG audited contractor and a firm that has sat out the program for years.

HUD owes the public the criteria. If past performance was the test, show the data. If capability was the test, show the matrix. If it was neither, say so.

A limited sources competition is supposed to narrow the field to firms that can do the work. HUD’s version narrowed it to firms that answered, and then it kept the weakest of them. Foreclosurepedia expects Altisource and VRM to ask HUD the same question and protest the J&A if there is a path still remaining to do that.

Same Habit, Worse Facts

In 2021, HUD had five days and a pandemic to explain itself. In 2026, HUD’s own Justification says it will decline options for years 3 and 4 that it still holds. It has known the November 1, 2026 expiration since it signed the contracts. It had months, not days.

HUD sole-sourced DGG with a reason. It now shortlists a debtor, a HUD OIG-audited contractor and a firm that has been out of the program for years, and it calls the result “uniquely capable.” HUD should have to defend that phrase under oath, one firm at a time.

The Solicitation Is Already Falling Apart

HUD has already amended its own solicitation. Amendment 0001 partially cancels four of the eight areas, 1D, 2D, 4D/5D and 5P. Those four areas carry $96,622,154.00 of the $170,829,743.00. The amendment gives no reason.

Foreclosurepedia will not guess at the reason. HUD should say what changed, and whether anyone looked at the A2Z bankruptcy docket before pulling half the work off the table.

Alpine’s three areas are worth $51,568,665.00. Five areas remain unassigned, and HUD has told the public nothing about which firm it intends for them.

Congress Is Already In The Room, By HUD’s Own Admission

No critic invented the Congressional inquiries. HUD wrote that they happened and that they put its “funding at risk.” Foreclosurepedia has not seen the inquiry letters themselves; however, we are sure that Secretary Scott Turner has been sweeping the issues under the rug as quick as he can.

What did HUD do about it? It did not recover the money for Labor. It did not publish a debt list. It refuses to release information on the performance bond for Labor to file against including a recent FOIA filing. It sent no referral to the Inspector General that Foreclosurepedia has seen. It drafted a procurement document and named a bankrupt firm among the three it trusts.

If HUD believes its funding is at risk, the way to protect that funding is to pay the people who did the work and explain where the money went. Shortlisting a Chapter 11 debtor does the opposite.

Who Signs This

Secretary Scott Turner commands this department. The Justification passed through senior procurement officials and carries their approvals, and Paul Olin’s name sits in that chain. Turner was in position to ask what HUD checked before it shortlisted A2Z. He was in position to ask why unpaid vendors were still unpaid. Foreclosurepedia has seen no sign that he did.

Why he did not is immaterial. The signatures are on the page, and every one of them was a chance to stop.

What HUD Must Do Now

HUD should withdraw A2Z Field Services from the shortlist today. It should explain in writing why a debtor with no full-time employees was found “uniquely capable.” It should say what it knew about 24 Asset Management’s unpaid vendors, and when.

HUD should publish the criteria and scoring that kept Alpine, PKMG and A2Z on the list and dropped Altisource and VRM. It should open every remaining area to full and open competition. It should publish the liquidated damages it has withheld from its Field Service Management prime contractors, and what Labor has received in return. And it should refer the matter to its Inspector General in writing and say so publicly.

Congress should do what HUD’s own document says it is already doing. Ask questions, put them in writing and demand answers on the record.

What Labor Does Now

If A2Z owes you money, file your proof of claim in Case No. 26-52098 and call the office of Subchapter V Trustee Donald W. Mallory to confirm you were listed. If 24 Asset Management owes you, document every unpaid work order by property, service, date and amount, and send it to the HUD Office of Inspector General.

Then call your Representative and your Senator. HUD wrote that Congressional inquiries put its funding at risk. Call the media in your hometown. And file litigation against the appropriate parties that owe money including 24 Asset Management.

HUD put its reputation and its funding at risk in writing. A2Z has $1,979.31. Labor is still waiting.

Meanwhile The A2ZFS Debt Keeps Getting Worse

Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

 

 

HUD Shortlisted A Bankrupt Company To Fix What It Says Unpaid Vendors Broke: A2Z Field Services Has $1,979.31 In The Bank And $261,065.19 In Past-Due Vendor Bills

By
Editor In Chief
-
Turner Treasure

A2Z Field Services has been in Chapter 11 since May 1, 2026. Its sworn August report shows $1,979.31 in the bank, zero full-time employees, and $261,065.19 in past-due vendor bills. HUD’s J&A 26-30 calls A2Z Field Services “uniquely capable” of running federal Field Service Management work.

That is the same J&A in which HUD explains why it is ending the old contracts. HUD cites “key vendors suspending operations because of outstanding client invoices, lack of property preservation and maintenance triggering property liens and blocking the marketing or sale of homes, and non-payments escalated to Congressional inquiries, putting the Agency’s reputation and funding at risk.”

HUD wrote that unpaid vendors put its own reputation at risk when identifying the nearly $400,000 owed to Labor by 24 Asset Management. Then it shortlisted a bankrupt company that has not paid its vendors. Even worse, though, Secretary Scott Turner has had the opportunity to pay Labor and has categorically refused to even publicly acknowledge the problem. And Acting Deputy Secretary Paul Olin simply further embedded the salt in Labor’s wounds by short listing a currently in bankruptcy, with zero employees firm, A2Z Field Services for new HUD M&M FSM awards.

The Debtor HUD Called Capable

A2Z filed Case No. 26-52098 in Subchapter V, Southern District of Ohio. Black Dome Services, which bought A2Z in October 2025 according to the debtor’s own declaration, has asked the court to dismiss the case. Trial on that motion is set for December 11, 2026. So, which A2Z Field Services is HUD even dealing with?!

The declaration also lists over $1.1 million in merchant cash advances. The court has extended A2Z’s use of cash collateral, which means a lender holds a lien on the cash. HUD’s J&A says it reviewed each respondent for “financial securities.”

Now read the August report. Cash fell from $19,344.06 to $1,979.31 in one month, a drop of $17,364.75, or 89.77 percent. The $261,065.19 owed to vendors is 131.90 times what A2Z has in the bank.

Not One Dollar Is Current

Nothing on the aging schedule is under 31 days old. $71,337.34 is 31 to 60 days past due. $189,727.85, or 72.67 percent, is 61 days or older. The schedule runs four pages of vendors, and many are Field Service Technicians and Inspectors who did the work.

A2Z’s declaration says it had about 600 contractors working for it. The August report shows zero full-time employees, both now and on the day the case began. The declaration said 17 of its 19 employees were full-time.

HUD Certified What The Debtor’s Own Report Contradicts

The J&A says the work requires a “fully staffed and equipped office.” It says the three recommended firms have “the necessary office space, access to staffing, and resources to provide these services immediately.” The Contracting Officer certified the justification as accurate and complete. Does that mean that Paul Olin, HUD’s Acting Deputy Secretary or Charles Hoyle Jr were wrong? Was the information both incorrect and wreckless? And what role does Secretary Scott Turner play as the buck should stop with him?

A2Z swears it has no full-time employees. Either HUD read that sworn report and called A2Z staffed anyway, or HUD never read it. The J&A never uses the word “bankruptcy.” Both answers are an indictment.

HUD Told Us What Happens Next

HUD’s own sentence is a forecast. Vendors stop working when invoices go unpaid. Homes go unmaintained. Liens block sales. Congress gets the letters. The Agency’s reputation and funding take the hit.

Put a bankrupt prime with $1,979.31 into that sequence and the first link breaks first. Foreclosurepedia expects the next round of Field Service Technicians and Inspectors to learn what the last round learned, and HUD will have signed the paper that sent them.

Two Firms, One Pattern

Foreclosurepedia’s running tally of what 24 Asset Management owes Labor is no less than $353,679.50. It is a floor and not an audit. Add A2Z’s sworn $261,065.19 and the two firms stand at no less than $614,744.69.

HUD says non-payment is why 24 Asset Management is losing its contracts. HUD then put a debtor with the same kind of debt on the shortlist. Foreclosurepedia asks which of those two firms HUD believes will pay Labor.

Who Signed

Paul M. Olin certified the justification as accurate and complete. Contracting Officer Charles W. Hoyle Jr. certified it on September 30. Acting Deputy Chief Procurement Officer Amber Jones signed on October 9. Chief Procurement Officer Francine L. Hemphill approved it on October 13.

A2Z’s bankruptcy was on the public docket for the entire period. Foreclosurepedia emailed Craig Karnes, the former director of HUD’s Management and Marketing program, A2Z’s sworn declaration in May 2026. That was more than a month before HUD sent its July Sources Sought Notice. He did not reply.

Either every official on that signature page read a public docket showing a debtor with no employees, or none of them looked. Secretary Scott Turner commands this department. He had the authority at every step to demand a bankruptcy check before anything left his building. The buck stops with him.

HUD Congressional Inquiries

Five Areas Are Still Open

The J&A prices eight areas at $170,829,743.00. Alpine Companies holds awards for three. The other five carry $117,886,987.00: 1D, 2D, 4D/5D, 5P, and 3S/5S. Foreclosurepedia has seen no awardee for any of them. The larger problem for Alpine Companies is the simple and salient fact that they cannot even figure out how to secure their website.

The J&A does not say which firm is meant to take which area. Foreclosurepedia has seen no award to A2Z or P.K. Management Group. Nothing is signed yet, and that is the window. Normally, we would link PK Management Group’s website, pkmg.net, but it no longer even exists. And even if they can overcome that hurdle, April Cooper has yet to publicly discuss whether she will pay Labor; at what rates and timelines would she pay Labor, and why Labor should even trust her with ~$400,000 still owed to Labor in the same award areas.

What The Law Asks Of HUD

A bankruptcy filing does not by itself bar a federal award. That is not the argument. The argument is that a contracting officer must find a contractor responsible before awarding, and the federal standard has long required adequate financial resources. Even looming larger is whether or not A2Z Field Services would be capable of passing a HUD security check due to the potential for financial leveraging by foreign nationals. Moreover, though, the HUD M&M FSM requires a performance bond and I am not familiar with any firm that would grant a ~$10 million dollar performance bond for a firm currently in bankruptcy.

HUD’s J&A cites no financial analysis of A2Z beyond “financial securities.” It never mentions the case, the cash collateral order, or the motion to dismiss. HUD should say who ran that analysis and what it showed. Instead of the opaqueness that Secretary Scott Turner shrouds himself in, full transparency should be on display before yet another half million dollars is stolen from Labor.

What Labor Does Now

If A2Z owes you money, file your proof of claim in Case No. 26-52098. The general deadline was July 17, 2026, and the government deadline is October 28, 2026. Call the office of Subchapter V Trustee Donald W. Mallory and ask whether A2Z listed your debt.

If 24 Asset Management owes you, file with the HUD Office of Inspector General. File liens. Hire a lawyer and sue Fast Eddie San Roman. Contact the media and your Congressional representatives. Document every unpaid work order by property, service, date, and amount. Ask any firm in writing how and when you will be paid before you accept an order.

Call your Representative and your Senator. HUD wrote that Congressional inquiries over non-payment hurt its reputation. Make the next inquiry.

HUD wrote that unpaid vendors put its reputation at risk. Then it shortlisted a bankrupt company with $1,979.31 in the bank. The vendors are still waiting.

Disclosure: Foreclosurepedia’s founder has previously worked for A2Z Field Services and has had a past consulting relationship with Alpine’s CEO.

HUD Says Unpaid Vendors Killed Its Old Contracts. Then It Shortlisted Bankrupt A2Z Field Services: $2,025.81 In The Bank, $261,065.19 In Past-Due Vendor Bills

By
Editor In Chief
-
Paul Olin

24 Asset Management, the former HUD M&M FSM awardee owes Labor at least $353,679.50, by Foreclosurepedia’s tally. The firm HUD called “uniquely capable” to replace that work is a Chapter 11 debtor with zero employees.

HUD never opened the docket on the Chapter 11 debtor it shortlisted for a $170.8 million federal contract, or it opened the docket and shortlisted the debtor anyway. Both answers are an indictment of the agency that just blamed non-payment for ending its own contracts.

Justification and Approval 26-30 names Alpine Companies, P.K. Management Group, and A2Z Field Services as “uniquely capable” of running Field Service Manager contracts across eight areas, estimated at $170,829,743. A2Z is Debtor-In-Possession in Case No. 26-52098, Southern District of Ohio, a Subchapter V case that began May 1, 2026. We caution the Foreclosurepedia Nation that both Alpine Companies and PK Management are insecure and may expose you to hacking.

Think about that for just a moment. Labor, whom rarely if ever interacts with humans on a HUD M&M FSM site, must pay to have a background check to even cut the grass. Apparently, anyone with a pulse clears the hurdles with HUD Secretary Scott Turner. No money? Check. Bankruptcy? Check. Potentially a target of foreign nationals wanting to hack the HUD P260? Check. That is just A2Z Field Services and we include their current bankruptcy balance sheet below. PK Management? Don’t even get me started on the fraud there. A simple search on Foreclosurepedia will tell the tale!

The bigger problem is that Alpine Companies, currently a HUD M&M FSM awardee, and PK Management both have insecure sites with PK Management not even allowing access.

What HUD Wrote About Unpaid Vendors

In the same document, HUD explains why it will not exercise the next option on the current 3.12 contracts. It cites “key vendors suspending operations because of outstanding client invoices, lack of property preservation and maintenance triggering property liens and blocking the marketing or sale of homes, and non-payments escalated to Congressional inquiries, putting the Agency’s reputation and funding at risk.”

HUD wrote that its own contractors’ non-payment drove vendors to stop work, put liens on homes, and put the agency’s “reputation and funding at risk.” Those are HUD’s words, in a federal procurement record.

What HUD Did Not Write

The Justification never names the contractor behind that language. It does not name 24 Asset Management, and it puts no dollar figure on what Labor is owed. Foreclosurepedia will supply both.

Foreclosurepedia has reported that HUD moved some of 24 Asset Management’s work to Alpine Companies. Foreclosurepedia’s running tally of money owed to Labor by 24 Asset Management stands at $325,679.50, plus a further $28,000 from an Indiana vendor, for at least $353,679.50. The upper end of the range is $358,679.50.

Of the $325,679.50, $154,679.50 sits on paper. That is $42,900.00 from Puerto Rico audits, $29,286.50 from an Illinois invoice sheet, $45,458.00 from a 1,023-invoice claim, and $37,035.00 from a Central Florida work order list. The other $171,000 to $176,000, and the Indiana $28,000, rest on vendors’ accounts.

That is a sum of separate claims, not an audited figure, and each claim is counted once. It is also a floor. Every number exists because a Field Service Technician or Inspector decided to say it out loud.

Add A2Z’s own sworn figure, $261,065.19 in past-due vendor payables, and the two firms stand at no less than $614,744.69 owed to Labor. One lost the work. The other made the shortlist.

What HUD Certified

The Justification says the work requires a “fully staffed and equipped office.” It says the three firms have the access to staffing and resources to perform immediately. It says HUD reviewed every respondent for conflicts of interest, financial securities, staffing, and ability to recruit. The Contracting Officer certified all of it as accurate and complete. None of them have staffed offices and even worse A2Z Field Services swears, under penalty of perjury, they do not even have employees. A simple Google search would have documented that should HUD Contracting Officer Charles Hoyle Jr or HUD General Acting Deputy Secretary Paul Olin ever found themselves around a keyboard instead of on a golf course.

Thirty Months Without An Open Bid

HUD did not open this $170,829,743.00 to the market. It sent a Sources Sought Notice to five companies it chose, cut them to three, and wrote that it would conduct a limited sources competition among the three.

Altisource Solutions and VRM Mortgage Services answered the notice in writing and were not shortlisted. A2Z Field Services answered it too, and A2Z is the debtor in bankruptcy that HUD kept.

The shortlist is not a bridge to 2027. The J&A sets a 12-month base period starting October 1, 2026, one 12-month option, and a six-month extension. HUD’s own J&A counts that as 30 months, which runs to roughly March 2029.

HUD says it “intends” to hold full and open competition in Fiscal Year 2027. The J&A promises only that HUD “anticipates” finishing planning, solicitation, and award during the performance period. HUD can decline the options, but nothing in the J&A says it will.

The J&A puts the cost of a 30-month gap in service at “approximately $126.3 billion in holding costs.” That is about 739 times the $170,829,743.00 contract value.

What The Court Record Shows

A2Z’s sworn monthly operating report for August, signed by Amie Sparks, lists zero full-time employees, both today and on the day the case began. HUD’s Justification calls that company fully staffed.

The same report shows cash falling from $19,390.56 to $2,025.81 in thirty-one days. That is a drop of $17,364.75, or 89.55 percent. The Chase statement confirms the closing balance to the cent. HUD certified that a company with about two thousand dollars in the bank can begin immediately.

Then look at where the money went. On the last day of August, four transactions took $22,293.26 out of the account, which is 90.45 percent of everything A2Z spent all month. Two wires totaling $10,000 went to law firms. An ACH of $8,448.26 went to a technology vendor. An ACH of $3,845.00 went to OnDeck, a lender A2Z lists among its creditors.

A2Z took in $7,283.30 for the entire month and wired $10,000 to lawyers in one afternoon. The bank statement shows no payment to any vendor on the debtor’s own aging schedule.

The Vendors Are On The Page

That aging schedule runs four pages. It lists $261,065.19 in past-due payables, which the debtor’s report labels postpetition. Not one dollar is under 31 days old. $71,337.34 sits in the 31-to-60 column. $189,727.85, or 72.67 percent, is at 61 days and over.

Those are vendors, and many of them are the Field Service Technicians and Inspectors who did the work. A2Z owes them 128.87 times what it has in the bank. The largest single balance is $21,912.75. They worked for a company already in bankruptcy court and they are still waiting.

Lawyers, Meanwhile

The report shows $75,570.00 paid to the debtor’s lead bankruptcy counsel since the case began, and $8,000.00 more to a second firm. That is $83,570.00 in professional fees, 41.25 times the cash left in the account.

The Balance Sheet HUD Did Not Read

The accrual balance sheet carries $794,532.91 in assets. Of that, $662,578.73 is a line labeled “Interco Receivable – Black Dome,” a claim against the company that acquired A2Z in late 2025. That is 83.39 percent of stated assets. Strip it out and $131,954.18 remains.

The same balance sheet lists $1,392,825.51 in total liabilities, including five short-term lenders and a $575,945.55 shareholder line of credit. Equity is negative $598,292.60. The report’s summary page lists total liabilities at zero. A federal contractor whose own schedules disagree is what HUD called uniquely capable.

The receivables tell the same story. $109,528.48 of the $123,234.60 owed to A2Z, or 88.88 percent, comes from two Progress Residential accounts. No HUD receivable appears.

The Docket Shows A Fight Over Whether The Case Survives

Black Dome Services, the company that bought A2Z, is a creditor in the case. It filed an amended motion to dismiss the Chapter 11 for lack of authorization and lack of standing. The court set a trial on that motion for December 11, 2026, with discovery closing December 4. The docket does not say why Black Dome wants the case gone, and Foreclosurepedia will not guess.

The court also extended A2Z’s use of cash collateral under a final order, which means someone holds a lien on the cash. The Justification mentions none of this. HUD certified that it reviewed financial securities.

HUD’s Own Paper Trail

The amendment that partially cancels the solicitation dates the solicitation to September. The signatures on the Justification that authorizes it run from late September to mid-October. At more than $90 million, the deal needed the Senior Procurement Executive, and that signature came in mid-October.

By then A2Z’s July and August operating reports had been on the public docket for weeks, and the bankruptcy itself for more than five months. HUD’s top procurement official approved the shortlist with all of it in plain view.

HUD Cannot Get The Name Right

The Justification lists A2Z’s contact as “Arnie Sparks-Beebe, CEO & President.” The sworn filing is signed by Amie Sparks. If HUD cannot confirm the name of the executive it plans to negotiate with, it did not confirm the finances behind her signature.

Karnes Knew In 2023. Ford And Washington Got The Same Record.

Foreclosurepedia put the 24 Asset Management non-payment record in writing before three HUD officials: Craig Karnes, former Assistant Chief Procurement Officer, LaShura Ford, Assistant Chief Procurement Officer for Field Operations, and HUD’s Sharon Washington.

Karnes did not merely receive the notice. In 2023 he answered it, in writing, and acknowledged that HUD “is aware of the relationship between 24 Asset Management and Assero.” He added that any continuing award would require 24 Asset Management to “mitigate any identified Conflicts of Interest.”

That is HUD admitting, three years ago, that it knew who stood behind the contractor leaving Field Service Technicians and Inspectors unpaid. The awards continued anyway. Foreclosurepedia then sent the stopped $21,000 check, the National Field Network warning, and the unserviced Illinois assets to the same procurement office.

Ford and Washington received the same record. None of the three has answered Labor, and Foreclosurepedia has seen no referral to HUD’s Inspector General. HUD then wrote unpaid vendors into a J&A as its emergency and shortlisted a debtor in bankruptcy.

The Solicitation Is Already Coming Apart

HUD has already cancelled part of its own competition. Amendment 0001 partially cancels the solicitation for areas 1D, 2D, 4D/5D, and 5P. Those four areas carry $96,622,154 of the $170,829,743 estimate, or 56.56 percent. The amendment gives no reason.

The remaining four areas carry $74,207,589. HUD should say whether the bankruptcy docket had anything to do with the cancellation, and which areas A2Z was ever meant to receive.

The Emergency Is Fiction

HUD invoked unusual and compelling urgency to skip full and open competition. It has known when these contracts expire since the day it signed them. It has known about the vendor non-payment it now cites for the entire period it says it needed to act.

HUD also admits it will hold a full and open competition in Fiscal Year 2027. The agency can compete this work. To avoid doing so, it claims a lapse would cost approximately $126.3 billion in holding costs, against a contract value of $170.8 million. That is 739 times the contract. No method accompanies the number.

What This Means for Labor

The Justification states that the follow-on contracts involve “no changes to the core services performed under the current contracts.” That means no escrow, no direct-pay safeguard, and no payment protection for Field Service Technicians and Inspectors. HUD is renewing the structure that left Labor holding unpaid invoices.

If A2Z owes you money, know the deadlines. The general deadline to file claims in Case No. 26-52098 was July 17, 2026. The government deadline is October 28, 2026. If you have not filed, call the office of the Subchapter V trustee, Donald W. Mallory, and ask whether A2Z listed your debt.

If 24 Asset Management owes you, file with HUD’s Office of Inspector General. File liens. Hire a lawyer. Report it to your Congressional Representative and Senator. Finally, contact the local media and feel free to cite this article! This is federally funded work, and a documented pattern is harder to dismiss than one vendor’s invoice.

The Bottom Line

HUD wrote that unpaid vendors, liens on homes, and Congressional inquiries are why the old contracts are ending. The old contractor owes Labor at least $353,679.50. HUD then shortlisted a debtor with $2,025.81 in the bank, zero employees, and $261,065.19 in past-due vendor bills. The reason is on the page. The remedy is not. Neither is the due diligence.

The Docs No One Wants You To See

Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab
Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab
Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab
Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

 

 

123...510Page 1 of 510