Virtually all NAMFS members whom are direct contract awardees have DEI departments. Mortgage Contracting Services (MCS) is the loudest and proudest as seen from the cover photo today from their website, located here. For years, the Industry has attempted to camouflage low pay to US citizens behind a wall of DEI word salads. This time, though, Eric Miller stepped firmly in the pile of shit he and his Board created. At the recent National Association of Mortgage Field Services (NAMFS) Annual Conference, the NAMFS Board of Directors approved the support of Gender Identity and along with NAMFS Membership, physically volunteered with Refresh North Texas. Seems innocuous, right, keeping proper hygiene for the kids? The problem presents when you actually read their website’s agenda of gender identity,
The NAMFS foray into gender identity was one I never thought I would see. I mean allowing children to say if they are male or female is the epitome of madness. These are the NAMFS members and their companies they represent who support this misguided policy. Eric Miller, the Executive Director of NAMFS has raked in more than One Million Dollars in salaries just over the past 10 years. With benefits and perks, that number skyrockets. Miller — and the NAMFS Board —have never made any bones about not supporting the Trump Administration’s policy objectives. I would go further and note that ironically even firms like Cyprexx, whose founder Ronny Ory donated $1 Million to the previous Trump inauguration, seem to support the NAMFS experiment in gender identity. The support I infer is based upon their continued financial support not only of NAMFS, but the continued re-election of Miller, himself.
In fairness, one recently elected NAMFS Board member stated that they had no idea how the NAMFS labor was physically organized and occurred. If this is, in fact, true it would beg the question of who exactly runs NAMFS.
The Trump Administration has seen fit to bring this type of madness to an end. In an Executive Order entitled Ending Radical And Wasteful Government DEI Programs And Preferencing which ordered the Office of Management and Budget terminate, to the maximum extent allowed by law, all DEI, DEIA, and “environmental justice” offices and positions (including but not limited to “Chief Diversity Officer” positions); all “equity action plans,” “equity” actions, initiatives, or programs, “equity-related” grants or contracts; and all DEI or DEIA performance requirements for employees, contractors, or grantees.
This is bad news for Eric Miller, the NAMFS Board, and his supporters whom championed the gender identity drama in Texas, last year, at the NAMFS #FraudFest.
The multi-decade long assault upon Labor by NAMFS is coming to an end because a lot of the Labor used to fuel the antitrust is being deported. The reality is that the small circle of loyalists advising the Miller Regime have failed him, completely. And similar to the recently publicized infirmities of former President Biden, keeping the NAMFS Executive Director Eric Miller out of the public eye has, thus far, worked. Both NAMFS and the National Association of Default Professionals (NADP) appear to have a lockdown on what and how Miller is allowed to publicly appear. And when it comes to unscripted social media or Association commentary, it has been missing for over a year, now. The distancing of Verisk, the firm that bought Property Preservation Wizard from former NAMFS President Matt Zoldowski, from Miller has been palpable. Many are beginning to question whether or not Miller has the stamina to perform, in light of his age and the decade plus long iron grip control over NAMFS.
Miller’s $100,000+ annual salary to simply repost a few things on social media and collect NAMFS member cash is not sitting well with people. The numbers below, from the latest IRS data available showing the $62,000+ loss, while Miller’s income consumed all NAMFS member dues plus a decent chunk of all other NAMFS revenue, is far beyond alarming, if not outright illegal under IRS regulations for a Trade Association.
The numbers do not lie. Perhaps its time for both Mr Ory and the NAMFS Board to investigate, outside of the typical DEI scope, and answer questions currently being asked not only by the NAMFS membership, but of those whom understand precisely how much may legally be paid to a nonprofit Executive Director.
